I was right beneath the she-camel of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, with her saliva dripping onto me, when I heard him say, "Allah has assigned to every rightful claimant his due, so there is no bequest for an heir. The child belongs to the marriage-bed, and for the fornicator there is the stone. Let no man claim allegiance to anyone other than his own family, nor claim descent from anyone other than his father. Whoever does so, upon him is the continuous curse of Allah until the Day of Resurrection. Let no woman spend from her husband's house without his permission."A man asked, "Not even food, Messenger of Allah?"He replied, "Is food not the most valuable of our possessions? A borrowed item must be returned, a loaned animal given for use must be given back, a debt must be repaid, and the guarantor is liable."
إني لتحت ناقة رسول الله ﷺ يسيل علي لعابها فسمعته يقول: إن الله جعل لكل ذي حق حقه، ألا لا وصية لوارث، الولد للفراش، وللعاهر الحجر، ألا لا يتولن رجل غير سواليه، ولا يدعين إلى غير أبيه، فمن فعل ذلك فعليه لعنة الله متتابعة إلى يوم القيامة، ألا لا تنفقن امرأة من بيتها إلا بإذن زوجها، فقال رجل: إلا الطعام يا رسول الله، فقال: وهل أفضل أموالنا إلا الطعام؟ ألا إن العارية مؤداة، والمنيحة مردودة، والدين مقضي، والزعيم غارم.
Ibn Majah (2714), Abu Amr Madini in Hijjat Wada (39), and Tabarani in Musnad Shamiyin (621), this last being the wording used, all narrated it, all of them from the hadith of Muhammad bin Shuayb bin Shabur, who said that Abdul-Rahman bin Yazid bin Jabir narrated to them, from Saeed bin Abu Saeed, that he narrated to him from Anas bin Malik, and he mentioned it. Its chain of transmission is sahih, and Muhammad bin Shuayb bin Shabur has some minor criticism against him that does not harm the hadith, especially since he has been corroborated.This is what Abu Dawud (5115) narrated from Sulayman bin Abdul-Rahman Dimashqi, who said that Umar bin Abdul-Wahid narrated to them, from Abdul-Rahman bin Yazid bin Jabir, who said that Saeed bin Abu Saeed narrated to him, while they were in Beirut, from Anas bin Malik, who said, "I heard the Messenger of Allah ﷺ say, 'Whoever claims to belong to a father other than his own, or attaches himself to patrons other than his own, upon him is the curse of Allah, continuous until the Day of Resurrection.'" He mentioned it in abbreviated form.Daraqutni (4/70) narrated it from Abu Bakr Nisaburi, who said that Abbas bin Walid bin Mazyad narrated to them, that his father informed him, that Abdul-Rahman bin Yazid bin Jabir narrated to them, that Saeed bin Abu Saeed, an elder residing on the coast, narrated to him, saying, "A man from the people of Madinah narrated the hadith to me," and he mentioned it in abbreviated form.Thus he made Saeed bin Abu Saeed a different man from Maqburi. If this is correct, then the chain is daif due to the anonymity of this coastal narrator, even though Tabarani explicitly stated that he was Maqburi, which is what Busiri and others adopted, and so they graded this hadith sahih.Ibn Asakir claimed that Saeed bin Abu Saeed came to Syria as a border guard and narrated on the coast of Beirut, so it is not unlikely that he is Maqburi, the man of Madinah who resided on the coast. Some scholars distinguished between Maqburi and the coastal narrator, and this is the view adopted by Ibn Hajar in Taqrib.So it is possible that Anas bin Malik had two narrators, one being the well known Maqburi of Madinah, and the other being the unknown coastal narrator of Beirut, so each strengthens the other. And success comes from Allah.