A close relative of hers was with her, in the throes of death. When the Prophet ﷺ saw the state he was in, he said to her, "Do not grieve for your loved one, for this is among his good deeds."
أن رسول الله ﷺ دخل عليها، وعندها حميم لها يخنقه الموت. فلما رأى النبي ﷺ ما بها قال لها: لا تبتئسي على حميمك فإن ذلك من حسناته.
Ibn Majah (1451) narrated it from Hisham bin Ammar, who said, Walid bin Muslim narrated to us, who said, Uzai narrated to us, from Ataa, from Ayesha, and he mentioned it. Its chain is hasan because of Hisham bin Ammar, the teacher of Ibn Majah, for he was "truthful, a Quran reciter, who grew old and began to be prompted, so his earlier hadith is more sound, and he heard from Maruf al-Khayyat, but Maruf is not reliable." This is how it appears in Taqrib, and Ibn Main and Ajli both affirmed his reliability. Nasai said, there is no harm in him. Daraqutni said, truthful. Ibn Hibban mentioned him among the reliable narrators. I say, someone like him has his hadith graded hasan.As for Walid bin Muslim, he is the Damascene, well known, and there is agreement on his reliability in himself. They only criticized him for excessive tadlis and for smoothing over chains. So when he explicitly states that he heard from his teacher, who is Uzai, and he did state this, and his teacher likewise stated explicitly from his own teacher, then this is accepted by everyone. And even when he merely says "narrating from" his teacher, and the teacher's teacher is not stated explicitly, the majority still accept it. This is why Busiri said in Misbah Zujaja, "This chain is sahih, its narrators are reliable. As for Walid, even though he practiced tadlis, he stated explicitly that he narrated directly, so the suspicion of his tadlis is removed."