When the heads of the Azariqa were brought and mounted on the steps of Damascus, Abu Umama came. When he saw them, his eyes welled up with tears, and he said three times, "Dogs of the Fire. These are the worst of the slain ever killed beneath the canopy of the sky, and the best of the slain killed beneath the canopy of the sky are those whom these men killed."I asked, "What is the matter with you? Your eyes have welled up with tears."He replied, "Out of compassion for them, for they were once among the people of Islam."We said, "Is this from your own opinion, that these are dogs of the Fire, or is it something you heard from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ?"He said, "Would I be so bold? Rather, I heard it from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ not once, not twice, not three times." And he counted several times over.
لما أتي برؤوس الأزارقة، فنصبت على درج دمشق، جاء أبو أمامة، فلما رآهم دمعت عيناه، فقال: كلاب النار، ثلاث مرات، هؤلاء شر قتلى قتلوا تحت أديم السماء، وخير قتلى قتلوا تحت أديم السماء الذين قتلهم هؤلاء، قال: فقلت: فما شأنك؟ دمعت عيناك، قال: رحمة لهم، إنهم كانوا من أهل الإسلام، قال: قلنا: أبرأيك؟ قلت: هؤلاء كلاب النار أو شيء سمعته من رسول الله ﷺ؟ قال: إني لجريء، بل سمعته من رسول الله ﷺ غير مرة ولا ثنتين ولا ثلاث. قال: فعد مرارا.
Ahmad (22183) narrated it, and this is his wording, along with Tirmidhi (3000), Ibn Majah (176), and Tayalisi (1232), all of them through routes from Abu Ghalib, who then mentioned it. Tirmidhi said, "This is a hasan hadith. Abu Ghalib's name is Hazwar, and Abu Umama Bahili's name is Sudayy bin Ajlan, and he was the chief of Bahila."I say, it is as he said. Abu Ghalib is disputed, but his hadith is hasan so long as he does not bring something objectionable. He has been corroborated by Sayyar Amawi, who is truthful, in Ahmad (22151), and by Shaddad bin Abdullah Abu Ammar in Hakim (2/149). In some narrations it is mentioned that Abu Umama recited, "On the Day when some faces will turn white and some faces will turn black" [Al Imran 3:106]. In some narrations it occurs as marfu, but the correct view is that it is mawquf. The hadith has been narrated from Abu Umama with different wordings, some of which contain objectionable elements that their narrators were not corroborated on.