Azami 15053

Reported by Hakim (4/311) and from him Bayhaqi in Shuab (4854), from Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Amrawiyah Bazzar, who said, Muhammad bin Ishaq Saghani told us, Hasan bin Musa Ashyab told us, Uqbah bin Abdullah Asamm told us, Abdullah bin Burayda told us, from his father, who said, then he mentioned it.Its chain is hasan because of Uqbah bin Abdullah Asamm Rifai, about whom most of the leading scholars spoke critically, declaring him daif. However, Ibn Shahin transmitted from Ahmad bin Salih that he affirmed his reliability, and Ibn Adi said, "Some of his hadiths are sound, and some of them are not corroborated." I say, this is one of his sound hadiths, especially since it has been corroborated.It was reported by Abu Dawud (4977), Ahmad (22939), Bukhari in Adab al-Mufrad (760), and Nasai in Amal al-Yawm wal-Layla (244), all of them through the route of Qatada, from Abdullah bin Burayda, from his father, who said, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, "Do not call the hypocrite 'sayyid,' for if he truly is a sayyid, then you have angered your Lord ."Bukhari said in Tarikh al-Kabir (4/12), "It is not known whether Qatada heard from Ibn Burayda." I say, I have not found any of the scholars who affirmed or denied his having heard from him, and Bukhari, may Allah have mercy on him, follows the school of thought that requires establishing an actual meeting, and is not satisfied with mere contemporaneity. In sum, the hadith rises, through the two chains together, to the level of hasan, and Munziri deemed it sahih, saying, "Abu Dawud and Nasai reported it with a sahih chain."