Ahmad 7862

Its isnad is sahih. It appears in Jami al-Masanid 7:453, taken from this very place, and Tirmidhi related it 4:12, through Abdah bin Sulayman Kullabi and Abdul-Rahim bin Sulayman Ashall, both of them from Muhammad bin Amr, with this same isnad.Ibn Hibban related it in his Sahih, in a slightly longer form [7:354 of the manuscript of al-Ihsan], through Isa bin Yunus, from Muhammad bin Amr, with the same wording. Hakim likewise related it in al-Mustadrak 4:271, through Isa bin Yunus, and said, "This is a hadith that is sahih according to the criterion of Muslim, though the two of them did not include it." Dhahabi said nothing about it.It will come again at 8028 through the narration of Hammad from Muhammad bin Amr.Munziri mentioned it in Targhib wa Tarhib 4:59, and said, "Ahmad related it, as did Ibn Hibban in his Sahih, and the wording given is his." Bukhari made some critical remark about this hadith, but I have not been able to identify any defect in it, nor do I know where Bukhari commented on it or what he said.As for the wording "ma yahummuha," in manuscripts H and M it reads "ma yajiuh." We corrected it based on manuscript K and Jami al-Masanid.