Ahmad 5627

Its isnad is extremely daif, because of Faraj bin Fadala, as we explained in detail regarding the previous isnad.Muhammad bin Abdullah Amiri, the most likely view in my opinion is that he is Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Amr bin Hisham Qurashi Amiri, who is trustworthy. Bukhari gave his biography in al-Kabir 1/1/141, 142, and Ibn Hibban mentioned him in al-Thiqat.Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Amr bin Uthman, his reliability was already established at 581, and we add here that Bukhari gave his biography in al-Kabir 1/1/138, 139. We hold that he does not belong to the generation of the Followers who met Abdullah bin Umar, in fact he is not a Follower at all, rather he narrates from the Followers. This means that beyond its weakness, this isnad is also disconnected.We have already spoken at length about the text of the hadith in the previous isnad.