Ahmad 532

Its chain of transmission is extremely daif. Hasan bin Bishr bin Salm Kufi is trustworthy. Abbas bin Fadl Ansari Waqifi is extremely daif. Ibn Madini said, "His hadith has been discarded." Bukhari said in Tarikh al-Kabir 4/1/5, "His hadith is rejected." He said the same in Duafa Sagheer 25. Abdullah bin Ahmad said, "My father did not hear from him, and he forbade me from writing from anyone who narrated from him." So it is strange that Abdullah would include his hadith among the additions to the Musnad after his father had forbidden it. Haythami said the same, 4/133, saying, "Abdullah narrated it in the Musnad, and in it is Abbas bin Fadl Ansari, who has been accused of lying."Hisham bin Ziyad Qurashi, Abu Miqdam, is also daif. Ibn Main said, "Daif, he amounts to nothing." Bukhari said in Tarikh al-Kabir 4/2/199-200, "Daif." Nasai said in Duafa 54, "His hadith is discarded."His father, Ziyad bin Abu Yazid, the freed slave of Uthman, was deemed weak by Bukhari, and Ibn Hibban mentioned him in Thiqat, saying, "He is daif." This is as stated in Tajil.Mihjan, the freed slave of Uthman, was mentioned by Ibn Hibban in Thiqat, who said, "The people of Madinah narrated from him." Hafiz said in Tajil, "The one who narrated from him is daif, and they mentioned no other narrator from him besides him." Bukhari mentioned him in Tarikh al-Kabir 4/2/8 without mentioning any criticism of him. See 508.