The Prophet ﷺ passed by a land called Ghadirah and renamed it Khadirah.
أن النبي ﷺ مر بأرض تسمى غدرة، فسماها خضرة.
No references are available.
It was narrated by Abu Yaala (4556), Tabarani in Awsat (652), and Ibn Hibban (5821), all through Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Numayr, who said, we were told by Abda, from Hisham bin Urwa, from his father, from Ayesha, and he related it, and its chain is sahih. Tabarani said, "No one narrated this hadith from Hisham except Abda." Haythami said in Majma (8/51), "It was narrated by Abu Yaala and Tabarani in Awsat, and the men of Abu Yaala are the men of the Sahih." Busiri said in Ithaf Khayra Mahra, "Its narrators are trustworthy."As for what is narrated from Abu Darda, who said, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, "You will be called on the Day of Resurrection by your names and the names of your fathers, so make your names good," this contains a break in the chain. It was narrated by Abu Dawud (4948), Ahmad (21693), Ibn Hibban (5818), and Bayhaqi (9/306), all through routes from Hushaym, who said, we were told by Dawud bin Amr, from Abdullah bin Abu Zakariya Khuzai, from Abu Darda, and he related it. Its chain is broken, for Abdullah bin Abu Zakariya never heard anything from Abu Darda, as Abu Hatim and others have said. See Jami Tahsil (p. 211). Likewise Bayhaqi said following the hadith, "This is a mursal narration, Ibn Abu Zakariya did not hear from Abu Darda." Hafiz faulted it on this same basis in Fath al-Bari (10/577), saying, "Its men are trustworthy, but there is a break in its chain between Abdullah bin Abu Zakariya and Abu Darda, for he never met him."Likewise, what is narrated from Ibn Abbas, who said, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ used to look for good omens and not bad ones, and he liked a good name, is not sound. It was narrated by Ahmad (2328) from Uthman bin Muhammad (that is, Ibn Abu Shayba), and Abu Dawud Tayalisi (2813), both from Jareer, from Layth bin Abu Salim, from Abdul-Malik bin Saeed bin Jubayr, from Ikrima, from Ibn Abbas, and he related it. Its chain is daif because of Layth bin Abu Salim. As for Abdul-Malik, he is identified by his full lineage in Ahmad's version, but appears unspecified in Tayalisi's version, so Abu Dawud said, "I think he is Ibn Abu Bashir." This is what he said, but it is a mistake.