Ahmad 6829

Its isnad is sahih, and it is a repetition of 6823.6829m - I think Araj told me, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, something similar. Sahih (6829m)Its isnad is sahih, and it follows the isnad before it. The one who says "I think Araj..." etc. is Abdullah bin Hasan, and this doubt does not affect the ruling, for he also related it without any doubt, as we will mention in the referencing, Allah willing. Araj is Abdul-Rahman bin Hurmuz Araj, whose reliability was already established at 6163.This hadith of Abu Hurairah was related by Thawri, from Abdullah bin Hasan, from Araj, from Abu Hurairah, but Abdullah had doubt about it, saying, "I think Araj told me, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, something similar." It will come again in the Musnad of Abu Hurairah at 8281, from Abu Amir Aqadi, from Abdul-Aziz bin Muttalib, from Abdullah bin Hasan, from Abdul-Rahman Araj, from Abu Hurairah, as a raised report, which removes the suspicion of doubt that Sufyan Thawri related from Abdullah bin Hasan.Ibn Majah related it, 2:64, from Muhammad bin Bashshar, from Abu Amir Aqadi, with the isnad mentioned. Busiri said in his Zawaid, "Its isnad is hasan, because its level falls short of the people of precise memorization and mastery." This is what he said, but it is actually a sahih isnad meeting the standard of Muslim, its narrators are all trustworthy and undisputed, except for Abdul-Aziz bin Muttalib, and the more sound view is that he is reliable, for Muslim included a report from him in his Sahih.