I asked Ibn Umar about nabidh prepared in earthen jars, whether the Messenger of Allah ﷺ had forbidden it.He said, "So they claim."I said, "Did the Prophet ﷺ forbid it?"He replied, "So they claim."I said, "Did you hear it from him yourself?"He answered, "So they claim."So Allah turned him away from me. Whenever anyone was asked, "Did you hear it yourself?" he would become angry and almost quarrel with the questioner.
حدثنا محمد بن جعفر حدثنا شعبة
سألت ابن عمر عن نبيذ الجر أهل نهى عنه رسول الله ﷺ قال زعموا ذلك فقلت النبي ﷺ نهى فقال قد زعموا ذلك فقلت أنت سمعته منه فقال قد زعموا ذلك فصرفه الله عني وكان إذا قيل لأحد أنت سمعته غضب وهم يخاصمه
Its chain of transmission is sahih. Thabit is Banani. This hadith is a repetition of 5074, and see also 5429."Ahal tanmi" appears exactly this way in all three original manuscripts, with the interrogative hamzah affixed alongside "hal," which is unusual. In Lisan 14:235, Layth said, "Hal" is properly used for interrogation, as in "hal kana kadha wa kadha" (did such and such happen?) and "hal laka fi kadha wa kadha" (are you interested in such and such?). He said that Zuhayr's expression "ahal anta" involves a grammatical necessity, since "hal" is itself an interrogative particle, and so is the hamzah, and one cannot use two interrogative particles together.Ibn Yaish said in Sharh Mufassal 8:153–154, "Mubarrid permitted the addition of the interrogative hamzah before 'hal' and before other interrogative words." He then cited as evidence a line from the poetry of Zayd al-Khayl, "ahal raawna bi-safhi al-qaai dhi al-akam," and then said, "This is unusual and should not be taken as a model." The reasoning behind it is that "hal" was treated as equivalent to "qad."In a manuscript copy in the margin of K and M, it reads "atanmi," with "hal" omitted.