Ahmad 4811

Its chain of transmission is daif. Abu Bakr bin Abu Musa, this is how it appears in the three original manuscripts, but the correct form is meaning ibn Musa. Dhahabi mentioned him in Mizan 3:348, where he said, Abu Bakr bin Abu Shaykh, that is, Bukayr bin Musa, from Salim, is unknown, and Nafi bin Umar Jumahi alone transmitted from him.He also mentioned him in Tahdhib 1:496 under the name Bukayr bin Musa, saying, He is Abu Bakr bin Abu Shaykh, and he will come under the kunyahs. And in the section on kunyahs, 12:40, he said, Abu Bakr bin Musa is Ibn Abu Shaykh, and at 12:26 he said, Abu Bakr Ibn Abu Shaykh Sahmi is Bukayr bin Musa, who narrated from Salim bin Abdullah, and Nafi Jumahi narrated from him. He added nothing further.The hadith was narrated by Nasai, 2:291, at length, through the route of Ibrahim bin Abu Wazir, who said, Nafi bin Umar Jumahi narrated to us from Abu Bakr bin Abu Shaykh, who said, I was sitting with Salim. Then he related the hadith in a manner similar to what is given here. He then narrated it in shortened form through the route of Yazid bin Harun, who said, Nafi bin Umar Jumahi informed us from Abu Bakr bin Musa. He then also narrated it in shortened form through the route of Abu Hisham Makhzumi, who said, Nafi bin Umar narrated to us from Bukayr bin Musa.All of this indicates that his name was Bukayr, his kunyah was Abu Bakr, his father was Musa, whose kunyah was Abu Shaykh, and that what is established here in the original manuscripts, meaning "Ibn Abu Musa," is an error, the correct form being, meaning, "Ibn Musa."The juljul is the small bell that is hung around the necks of riding animals and the like. See Musnad, volume 6, page 426, in the musnad of Umm Habiba, so its sourcing and the analysis of its defect should be further verified.